The Development Control Authority (DCA) continues to show that it is politically influenced, and the United Progressive Party (UPP) is planning to sue its officials for the destruction of a caretaker’s billboard.
On the morning of Holy Thursday, March 28, DCA officials demolished and removed a billboard that had stood on the Whenner Road premises of the Party’s St. Mary’s North constituency branch.
The billboard was the property of UPP Senator Johnathan Joseph.
Accordingly, attorney Leon “Chaku” Symister, the Party’s spokesperson on legal matters, says the action taken by the DCA will be challenged in the High Court of Justice.
Calling the action illegal and politically motivated, Symister confirmed to REAL News that UPP Political Leader Jamale Pringle has directed that this matter be taken before the court right away.
The January 18, 2023 General Election came and went and the October 2023 by-election in St. Mary’s South, as well.
But, apparently, it has only just come to the attention of DCA head Frederick Southwell, the town and country planner, that political billboards are still in place.
In a letter dated March 25, 2024, and addressed to Senator Shawn Nicholas, the general secretary of the UPP, Southwell writes that permission was granted to the Party on December 15, 2022, for the
temporary erection of political billboards for the 2023 General Election. According to him, the UPP entered into an agreement in which it was “explicitly” stated that all political material should be removed within 14
days following the election.
Southwell says it has come to the DCA’s attention that political materials for the Party remain displayed well beyond the stipulated time frame granted – which is an oversight on the Authority’s part –and this contravenes the condition of the agreement.
He adds that this failure also impacts regulatory compliance, as stipulated in Section 51 of the Physical Planning Act, 2003.
The town and country planner therefore instructed the Party to take immediate action to remove all political paraphernalia “without further delay.”
Failure to do so “will leave the DCA with no other option but to proceed with the demolition” of the associated political materials, the letter says; so the UPP should act promptly to avoid any unnecessary actions.
That letter was received yesterday, March 27, one day before the demolition of the St. Mary’s North caretaker’s billboard.
Tellingly, Southwell appears to be focused only on billboards belonging to UPP politicians, since those of the Antigua Labour Party’s candidates remain in place, undisturbed.
On Whenner Road, mere yards from Senator Joseph’s branch office, a billboard displaying Sir Molwyn Joseph and Prime Minister Gaston Browne remained upright after the demolition of the UPP property.
In the prime minister’s constituency of St. John’s City West – 14 months after the General Election – a canvas of his image still stands on a plot of land reportedly owned by his relatives, while “political” billboards are said to remain on display in St. Paul, as well. This arbitrary removal of Senator Joseph’s billboard appears to have been sparked by a canvas that was displayed there two Fridays ago.
That canvas showed a photo of Brian Stuart-Young, Global Bank of Commerce’s chief executive officer; quoted a statement from Prime Minister Browne; and referred to the millions of United States dollars the
offshore bank owes businessman Jack Stroll.
With zero notice for removal or appeal, the DCA destroyed and removed the poster, leaving the original display – an image of Senator Joseph – intact and the billboard upright.
Then, last Friday, another canvas bearing Stuart-Young’s image and a call for the bank to pay Stroll was summarily removed from a billboard owned by UPP parliamentarian Kelvin “Shugy” Simon, in Bolans.
Simon has since said he intends to sue the DCA for trespassing on private property.
Residents have been critical of the DCA’s actions and accused the agency
– which falls within the portfolios of the prime minister’s wife, Maria Browne
– of being politically directed.
They contend that these actions are in breach of the constitutional right to freedom of expression and that the DCA has no legal authority to regulate the content, or message, of billboards.
Others have alleged that the destruction of the messages are Prime Minister Browne’s heavy-handed attempts to shield Stuart-Young from public criticism.
